• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Employee Benefits Law Group

Employee Benefits Law Group

Guidance. More than just Legal Advice.

  • What We Do
    • ESOPs
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Retirement Plans
    • Equity & Executive Compensation
    • Health & Welfare Plans
  • Our Team
  • Resources
  • Contact
Employee Benefits Law Group
Home > Resources > Retirement Plans > ESOP Distribution: Court Decided Validity

ESOP Distribution: Court Decided Validity

April 10, 2018 by Sheryl Bayani-Alzona

Two questions were at the heart of an retirement plan court case involving an ESOP distribution that was decided in 2018:

  • When is a retirement plan distribution a distribution?
  • Is a retirement plan distribution subject to state law or the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)?

Majors Plastics is a 100% employee-owned company with an ESOP. On Friday, September 12, 2014, one of its employee owners requested a lump-sum ESOP distribution of his accrued benefits to his personal trust. The stock totaled about $2.7 million. Prior to the request, the plan participant had filed for divorce from his wife.

What Happened Next

Majors Plastic’s ESOP Administrative Committee (Plan Committee) wired the funds on the day the ESOP distribution request was made. Two days later, on a Sunday, the plan participant died.

The funds reached his trust on Monday.

Because the couple were still married at the time of death, and because the ESOP defined a “beneficiary” as a “participant’s surviving spouse,” the wife submitted a claim for benefits. The Plan Committee denied the claim, explaining that the former ESOP plan participant had no accrued benefits under the plan at that point.

The wife sued, claiming that the wire transfer was irrelevant because the plan participant’s trust did not receive the funds until after his death.

The Plan Committee’s Defense

The Plan Committee argued that the relevant inquiry is not when the participant receives the funds, but rather when the funds are transferred out of the plan. Therefore, at the moment the funds left the plan, the plan had satisfied all obligations to the participant or beneficiary.

The Court’s Decision

A district court held that as of September 12, 2014, the date of transfer, the funds were no longer held by the plan and the participant had accrued no further benefits as of that date.

The court concluded that the plan gave the Plan Committee “broad discretionary authority” to determine eligibility for benefits, citing case law that states, “[w]here an ERISA plan grants the administrator discretion to determine eligibility for benefits and to interpret the plan’s terms, courts must apply a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard of review.”

The wife appealed with a claim that there was “no discretionary act at issue.” She argued that the case presented a legal question that required a “de novo” review of all of the facts rather than just a determination of whether the plan fiduciaries had abused the discretion granted to them under the plan. Her attorney also argued that the remedy should be determined under Nebraska state law rather than ERISA. Under Nebraska state law, a funds transfer is not completed until it is accepted.

But the federal 8th Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the district court’s ruling that the claim fell under ERISA 502(a), not state law. The appellate court also found that the Plan Committee had reasonably explained its interpretation of the plan and relied on substantial case law to deny the wife’s claim.

Guidance

What does your plan document say regarding payment of benefits? Does the plan satisfy obligations to the participant or beneficiary when the distribution is made or when the distribution is received by the participant? One thing is certain, be sure that when your plan committee denies claims, it provides a reasonable explanation of the committee’s interpretation of the plan and offers substantial evidence to back up that explanation.

Filed Under: Retirement Plans Tagged With: Blog

About Sheryl Bayani-Alzona

Sheryl guides her clients throughout the life of an ESOP, from the initial transaction and ongoing compliance and sustainability, through plan termination. Her clients rely on her when they are considering a liquidity event, a business succession plan, a plan to share equity with their employees, or as the first line of defense in the event of a DOL or IRS inquiry.
Learn More About Sheryl

EDITOR’S NOTE: We did the best we could to make sure the information and advice in this article were current as of the date of posting to the web site. Because the laws and the government’s rules are changing all the time, you should check with us if you are unsure whether this material is still current. Of course, none of our articles are meant to serve as specific legal advice to you. If you would like that, please call us at (916) 357-5660.

Recent Retirement Plans Posts

Controlled Group or Affiliated Service Group? What That Means for Your 401(k) Plan Compliance

Form 5500: The Role of the Accountant and the Audit Report

Coverage Rules For 401(k)’s and Other Qualified Plans – Part 3. Average Benefit Test and the Minimum Participation Rule

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe

We cover all things employee benefits law.

Privacy Policy

We never share your info.

Let’s Start a Conversation

Have questions about your current benefit plan? Want to know what your benefit plan options are? Whatever your need, we’re here to help. Fill out a hassle-free request form, and one of our team members will follow up to get you on the path to success.

Get In Touch

Footer

Our experienced team guides you in all aspects of ESOPs, M&A due diligence, retirement plans, equity / compensation, and health and welfare benefits.
Sacramento Office
916-357-5660
11231 Gold Express Dr.
Suite 108
Gold River, CA 95670
San Jose Office
408-467-3860
2033 Gateway Place
Suite 500
San Jose, CA 95110
Phoenix Office
2550 W. Union Hills Dr.
Phoenix, AZ 85027
Los Angeles Office
310-571-8896
10880 Wilshire Blvd
Suite 1101
Los Angeles, CA
90024
San Diego Office
916-357-5660
550 West B Street
San Diego, CA 92101
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Copyright © 2025 Employee Benefits Law Group · Privacy Policy · Site Design by Delos Incorporated